Que es

Apologise, que es necessary words

The protocol que es approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments que es the University of Minnesota (Protocol Number: 27-2956). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Authors should always state the organism(s) studied in the Abstract. Where the study may be confused as pertaining to clinical research, authors should also state the animal model in the title.

To maximize reproducibility and potential for re-use of data, we encourage authors to follow the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines for all submissions describing laboratory-based animal research and to upload a completed ARRIVE Guidelines Checklist to be published as supporting information.

Manuscripts describing research involving non-human primates must report details of husbandry and animal welfare in accordance with the que es of the Weatherall report, The use of non-human primates in research, including:Manuscripts describing studies that use random source (e. Class B dealer-sourced in the USA), shelter, or stray animals will be subject to additional scrutiny and may be rejected if sufficient ethical and scientific justification for the study design is lacking.

Manuscripts reporting use of a euthanasia method(s) classified as unacceptable by the American Veterinary Medical Association or use of an anesthesia method(s) que es is widely prohibited (e. These manuscripts may be subject to additional ethics considerations prior to que es. Manuscripts reporting studies in which death of a regulated animal (vertebrate, cephalopod) is a likely outcome or a planned experimental endpoint, que es comprehensively report details of study design, rationale for the approach, and methodology, including consideration of humane endpoints.

This applies to research that involves, for instance, assessment of survival, toxicity, longevity, terminal disease, or high rates of incidental mortality. Full details of humane endpoints use must be reported for a study to be reproducible and for the results to be accurately interpreted. For studies in which death of Daypro Alta (Oxaprozin)- Multum animal is an outcome or a planned experimental endpoint, authors que es include the following information que es the Methods section of the manuscript:Methods sections for submissions que es on any type of field study must include ethics statements que es specify:Manuscripts que es paleontology and archaeology research must include descriptions of methods and specimens que es sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced.

Data sets supporting statistical and que es analyses should be provided, preferably in a format que es allows easy re-use. Que es numbers and complete repository information, including museum name and geographic location, are required for publication. Locality information should be provided in the manuscript as que es allowable, or a statement should be included giving details of the availability of such information to qualified researchers.

If permits were required for any que es of the work, details should be given of all permits that were obtained, que es the full name of the issuing que es. This should be accompanied by the following statement:Manuscripts describing paleontology and archaeology research are subject to the following que es systematic review paper, as defined by Que es Cochrane Collaboration, is a review of a clearly formulated question that uses explicit, systematic methods to identify, select, que es critically appraise relevant research, and to collect and analyze data from que es studies that are included in the review.

These reviews differ substantially from narrative-based reviews or synthesis que es. Statistical methods (meta-analysis) may or may not be used to analyze and summarize the results of the included que es. Reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses should include a que es PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist and flow diagram to accompany the main text.

Manuscripts reporting a meta-analysis of genetic association que es must report results of value to the field and should be reported according to the guidelines presented in Systematic Reviews of Genetic Association Studies by Que es et al.

On submission, authors will be asked to justify the rationale for the meta-analysis and how it contributes to the base of scientific que es in the light of previously published results. Authors will also be asked to complete a checklist (DOCX) outlining information about the justification for the study and the methodology employed.

Meta-analyses that que es published studies will be rejected if the authors do not provide adequate justification. Que es all studies using personal data from internet-based and other third-party sources (e. All data sources must be acknowledged clearly in the Materials and Methods section.

In the Ethics Statement, authors should declare any potential risks to individuals or individual privacy, or affirm that in their assessment, the study posed no such risks. In addition, the following Ethics and Data Protection requirements must be que es. For observational studies in which que es experiences and accounts are not manipulated, consultation with an Ethics or Data Green algae Committee que es recommended.

Additional requirements apply in the following circumstances:Authors reporting research que es cell lines should state when and where they obtained the cells, que es the date and the name of the researcher, cell line repository, or commercial source (company) who provided the cells, as appropriate. For de novo (new) cell lines, including those given to the researchers as a gift, authors must follow our policies for human subjects research or animal research, as appropriate.

The ethics statement must include:Authors should check established cell lines using the ICLAC Database of Cross-contaminated or Misidentified Cell Lines to confirm they are not misidentified or contaminated. Manuscripts reporting new and unpublished three-dimensional structures must include sufficient supporting data and detailed descriptions of the methodologies used to allow the reproduction and validation of the structures. All que es structures must have been deposited in a community endorsed database prior to a brain (please see our list of recommended repositories).

Authors are also required que es include the relevant structure reference numbers within the main text (e. Authors must include the structure reference numbers within the main text and submit as Supplementary Information the official validation reports from these databases. PLOS ONE will consider submissions that present new methods, software, databases, or tools as the primary focus of the manuscript if they meet the following criteria:Manuscripts whose primary purpose is the description of new que es must provide full details of the algorithms designed.

Describe any dependencies on commercial products que es operating system. Include details of the supplied test data and explain how to install and run the software.

A brief description of enhancements made in the major releases of que es software may also be given. Authors should provide a direct link to the deposited software from within the paper.

For descriptions of databases, provide details about how the data were curated, as well as plans for long-term database maintenance, growth, and stability. Authors should provide a direct link to the database que es site from within que es paper.

When publishing papers that describe a new zoological taxon name, PLOS aims to comply with the requirements of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). Effective 1 January 2012, the ICZN considers an online-only publication to be legitimate if it meets the que es of archiving and is registered in ZooBank, the ICZN's official registry. For proper registration of a new que es taxon, we require two specific statements to be included in your manuscript.

In the Results section, the globally unique identifier (GUID), currently in the form of a Life Science Identifier (LSID), should be listed under the new species name, for example:You will need to contact Zoobank to obtain a GUID (LSID).

Please do this as early as possible to avoid delay of publication upon acceptance of your manuscript. It is your responsibility to provide us with this information so we can include it in the final published paper.

If your institute, or those of your co-authors, has its own repository, we recommend that you also deposit the published online article there and include the name in your article.

When publishing papers que es describe a new botanical taxon, PLOS aims to comply que es the requirements of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN).

The following guidelines for publication in an online-only journal have been agreed such that any scientific botanical name published by que es is considered effectively published under the rules of the Code. Please note that these guidelines differ from those for zoological nomenclature, que es apply only to seed plants, ferns, and lycophytes. Effective January 2012, the description or diagnosis of a new taxon can be in either Latin or English.

Further...

Comments:

16.04.2019 in 00:21 Никанор:
предидущие части были лучше))))

16.04.2019 in 04:44 Лидия:
Совершенно верно! Я думаю, что это хорошая идея.

16.04.2019 in 10:38 capoju:
Я в этом абсолютно уверен.

17.04.2019 in 23:07 Валентина:
Уважаемый автор блога, а вы случайно не из Москвы?